4.6 Article

Enhanced energy transfer in a Dicke quantum battery

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2022.1097564

关键词

quantum battery; Tavis-Cumming Hamiltonian; Dicke model; pseudo-Hermite polynomials; quantum speedup

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We theoretically investigate the enhancement of charging power in a Dicke quantum battery composed of N two-level systems (TLS) coupled to cavity photons. For small N, we analytically solve the time evolution of the charging process and find that the eigenvectors of the driving Hamiltonian are pseudo-Hermite polynomials, showing harmonic oscillator-like behavior. We demonstrate that the average charging power using a collective protocol is approximately root N times larger than that of the parallel protocol, and this quantum advantage is due to the coherent cooperative interactions among the TLSs rather than entanglement. Our results provide quantitative insight into the dynamic charging process of a Dicke battery and can be observed in realistic experimental conditions.
We theoretically investigate the enhancement of the charging power in a Dicke quantum battery which consists of an array of N two-level systems (TLS)coupled to a single mode of cavity photons. In the limit of small N, we analytically solve the time evolution for the full charging process. The eigenvectors of the driving Hamiltonian are found to be pseudo-Hermite polynomials and the evolution is thus interpreted as harmonic oscillator like behaviour. Then we demonstrate the average charging power using a collective protocol is root N times larger than that of the parallel protocol when transferring the same amount of energy. Unlike previous studies, we point out that such quantum advantage does not originate from entanglement but is due to the coherent cooperative interactions among the TLSs. Our results provide intuitive quantitative insight into the dynamic charging process of a Dicke battery and can be observed under realistic experimental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据