4.7 Article

Stifle kinematics in 4 dogs with cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency treated by CORA-based leveling osteotomy

期刊

FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1052327

关键词

cranial cruciate ligament; CORA; CBLO; kinematics; stifle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the three-dimensional limb motion in dogs with CCL-I treated with CBLO, and to assess the treatment effect through force plate gait analysis. The results showed that CBLO reduced craniocaudal motion and substantially improved lameness.
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to quantify three-dimensional (3D) stifle kinematics during walking in dogs with complete cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency (CCL-I) treated with a CORA-based leveling osteotomy (CBLO). Study designFour client-owned dogs with unilateral complete CCL-I were prospectively enrolled. Custom digital 3D models of the femora and tibiae were created from pre-and postoperative computed tomographic scans for each dog. Lateral view fluoroscopic images were collected during treadmill walking preoperatively and 6 months after CBLO. Results were generated using a 3D-to-2D image registration process. Pre-and postoperative stifle kinematics (craniocaudal translation, extension angle) were compared to that of the unaffected contralateral (control) stifle. Force plate gait analysis was performed, and symmetry indices (SI) were calculated for peak vertical force (PVF) and vertical impulse (VI). ResultsAfter CBLO, craniocaudal femorotibial motion was reduced by a median (range) of 43.0 (17.0-52.6) % over the complete gait cycle. Median (range) PVF SI was 0.49 (0.26-0.56) preoperatively and 0.92 (0.86-1.00) postoperatively, and VI SI was 0.44 (0.20-0.48) preoperatively and 0.92 (0.82-0.99) postoperatively. ConclusionCBLO mitigated but did not fully resolve abnormal craniocaudal translation; lameness was substantially improved at 6 months.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据