Cyberbullying definitions and measurements in children and adolescents: Summarizing 20 years of global efforts

Despite numerous instruments existing to assist in the measurement of specific cyberbullying behaviors or cyberbullying in general, it is still unclear their purpose, corresponding scenarios, and their effectiveness. This study, therefore, aims to provide a comprehensive review of academic efforts on cyberbullying definitions, measurements, and their effectiveness in children and adolescents in the past two decades. A systematic review was performed using ASReview, an open source machine learning systematic review system. Three bibliographic citation databases, including Web of Science core collection, PubMed, and EBSCO were adopted for all relevant literature published from January 2001 to August 2021. In total, twenty-five studies, mentioning seventeen cyberbullying measurement scales, met the study collection criteria. The results found that most failed to provide a clear definition of cyberbullying, often providing unclear and inconsistent descriptions for the youth. Similarly, studies found it difficult to clearly reflect the three key elements of bullying, namely: harmfulness, repetitiveness, and the power imbalance between bullies and victims. With regard to cyberbullying types, most presented two or three categories, including victimization, perpetration, and bystanding, while some suggested four types based on the nature of the cyberbullying behavior, including written or verbal, visual or sexual, character impersonation, and exclusion. If characteristics are considered, cyberbullying becomes more specific with multiple categories being proposed, including flaming (or roasting), harassment, denigration, defamation, outing, jokes, online sexual harassment, and cyberstalking. With regard to measurements, many scales have been proposed and frequently refined to capture specific cyberbullying experience of the youth. This study emphasizes the value and importance of providing clear cyberbullying definitions and helps scholars in youth cyberbullying choose appropriate measurement scales.

Automated summary

Despite the existence of numerous instruments for measuring cyberbullying, their purpose, corresponding scenarios, and effectiveness are still unclear. This study provides a comprehensive review of academic efforts on cyberbullying definitions, measurements, and effectiveness in children and adolescents over the past two decades. The study found that most research failed to provide clear definitions of cyberbullying and struggled to reflect the key elements of bullying. Regarding cyberbullying types, studies presented two to three categories, while some proposed four types based on the nature of the behavior. Measurements have been proposed and refined to capture specific cyberbullying experiences. The study emphasizes the importance of clear definitions and appropriate measurement scales for studying youth cyberbullying.