4.5 Article

Fatty Acid Spectra in Mesopelagic Fishes of the Myctophidae and Stomiidae Families Collected in the North East Atlantic

期刊

DIVERSITY-BASEL
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d15020166

关键词

lipids; fatty acids; mesopelagic fish; Stomiidae; Myctophidae; mesopelagic zone; North Atlantic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New data on the fatty acid compositions of muscle tissues in the mesopelagic zone's most widespread families revealed species-specific differences and the dominance of monounsaturated fatty acids as food tracers. Various adaptation strategies to depth gradients in lipid metabolism were also discussed.
New data on the fatty acid compositions of the muscle tissues of the two most widespread families of the mesopelagic zone-the Myctophidae (Notoscopelus kroyeri and Symbolophorus veranyi) and Stomiidae (Chauliodus sloani, Stomias boa, Borostomias antarcticus, and Malacosteus niger) families-were obtained from the Irminger Sea (North East Atlantic). The fatty acids (FAs) in the total lipids (TLs), phospholipids (PLs), triacylglycerols (TAGs), and cholesterol esters and waxes were analyzed using gas-liquid chromatography with a mass-selective detector and flame-ionized detector (GC-MS and GC-FID, respectively). Species-specific differences in the FA/alcohol profiles of the studied fishes were revealed. A directed deep-vise trend in the changes in the content and performance of certain FAs for the studied species was found. Along with this, a general character of dominance for monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), which were discussed as food tracers, was revealed. MUFAs in the muscle tissues included dietary markers of zooplankton (copepods)-20:1(n-9) and 22:1(n-11), the content of which varied in association with the species-such that the biomarker Calanus glacialis predominated in muscles of B. antarcticus and C. hyperboreus prevailed in other studied species. Different strategies of compensatory adaptation to depth gradient in lipid metabolism among the studied species were discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据