4.5 Review

The 'Edge Effect' Phenomenon in Plants: Morphological, Biochemical and Mineral Characteristics of Border Tissues

期刊

DIVERSITY-BASEL
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d15010123

关键词

plant wastes; outer tissues; bark; antioxidants; minerals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 'edge' effect is essential for maintaining ecological integrity, and the properties of plant outer tissues mimic this effect, suggesting its applicability to individual plant organisms.
The 'edge' effect is considered one of the fundamental ecological phenomena essential for maintaining ecosystem integrity. The properties of plant outer tissues (root, tuber, bulb and fruit peel, tree and shrub bark, leaf and stem trichomes) mimic to a great extent the 'edge' effect properties of different ecosystems, which suggests the possibility of the 'edge' effect being applicable to individual plant organisms. The most important characteristics of plant border tissues are intensive oxidant stress, high variability and biodiversity of protection mechanisms and high adsorption capacity. Wide variations in morphological, biochemical and mineral components of border tissues play an important role in the characteristics of plant adaptability values, storage duration of roots, fruit, tubers and bulbs, and the diversity of outer tissue practical application. The significance of outer tissue antioxidant status and the accumulation of polyphenols, essential oil, lipids and minerals, and the artificial improvement of such accumulation is described in connection with plant tolerance to unfavorable environmental conditions. Methods of plant 'edge' effect utilization in agricultural crop breeding, production of specific preparations with powerful antioxidant value and green nanoparticle synthesis of different elements have been developed. Extending the 'edge' effect phenomenon from ecosystems to individual organisms is of fundamental importance in agriculture, pharmacology, food industry and wastewater treatment processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据