4.7 Article

Function matters: Development of a value engineering building-function-assessment framework from stakeholders' perspectives using hybrid analytical methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106025

关键词

Assessment framework; Building functions; Hybrid analytical methods; Stakeholders' perspectives; Value engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a framework for assessing building functions using a hybrid approach. Through the collection and analysis of over 300 valid empirical data from major building stakeholders, 16 key building functions were identified and ranked in terms of their importance.
Assessment of building performance has long been studied. Building is constructed to accom-modate people and to meet their diverse needs with various building functions. It is important to identify building functions concerned by building stakeholders who are involved in building project lifecycle. Built on Value engineering (VE) methodology, this study applied hybrid methods for developing a framework for assessing building functions. After extensive review of VE pro-jects, building assessment literature and rating guideline, a theoretical framework was proposed that classifies building functions into four VE groups. Over 300 valid empirical data were collected from major building stakeholders, including developers, consultancy, contractors, etc. The data were subjected to statistical analyses including both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for identifying key building functions and their measurements. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach was applied to examine the relative importance of the building functions based on scored measurement items. The findings suggested that: 1) 16 key building functions were extracted and classified (e.g., save resources, ease main-tenance, improve durability and ensure reliability were classified in ensure dependability group); 2) building stakeholders' view on the importance of building functions was determined, with ensure reliability (w4: 0.139) and improve durability (w3: 0.125) being regarded as most important while support interaction (w12: 0.006) and enhance appearance (w14: 0.009) as least important functions. Development of the VE building-function-assessment framework contributed to enhance building assessment literature. Using hybrid methods in current study also suggest a novel way for multiple-criteria evaluation study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据