4.4 Review

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Surgery

Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy A Novel Standard of Care? Benchmark Values for Surgical Outcomes From 16 International Expert Centers

Philip C. Muller et al.

Summary: This study identified benchmark cutoffs for outcome parameters in robotic distal pancreatectomy (DP) and compared them with laparoscopic and open DP. The results showed that robotic DP had superior postoperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open DP, indicating it may become the preferred approach in minimally invasive DP.

ANNALS OF SURGERY (2023)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis

Dakyum Shin et al.

Summary: This study investigated the efficacy and feasibility of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The results showed that RDP had longer operative time, higher cost, but a higher likelihood of achieving R0 margins compared to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). The postoperative survival was similar between the two groups.

HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL (2023)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Comparison of infectious complications after spleen preservation versus splenectomy during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: A multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis

Woohyung Lee et al.

Summary: The study aimed to evaluate the advantages of spleen preservation during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) for preventing infectious complications. By comparing the data of postoperative infectious complications in different groups, the study found that spleen preservation could lower the risk of infectious complications, but the risk may vary according to the surgeon's experience.

JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES (2023)

Review Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Figures do matter: A literature review of 4587 robotic pancreatic resections and their implications on training

Giovanni B. Levi Sandri et al.

Summary: Experience with robotic pancreatic resection is still limited, and currently only pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) can be taught at a few institutions worldwide.

JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES (2023)

Article Surgery

Impact of the transection plan on postoperative pancreatic fistulas occurring after robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy for nonmalignant pancreatic neoplasms

Lihan Qian et al.

Summary: This study investigated the impact of remnant pancreas and other perioperative factors on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurring after robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) for nonmalignant pancreatic neoplasms. The results showed that a transection plan involving the tail of the pancreas and spleen preservation independently increased the incidence of POPF. The length of the remnant pancreas was also found to be a risk factor for POPF.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2023)

Article Surgery

A comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Propensity score matching analysis

Jaewoo Kwon et al.

Summary: Robotic distal pancreatectomy is more expensive but feasible, with a higher likelihood of completing the planned operation and a lower open conversion rate.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY (2022)

Article Surgery

Performance with robotic surgery versus 3D-and 2D-laparoscopy during pancreatic and biliary anastomoses in a biotissue model: pooled analysis of two randomized trials

Maurice J. W. Zwart et al.

Summary: This study found that in a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials in a biotissue model, robotic surgery resulted in better surgical performance scores and shorter operative time for biotissue pancreatic and biliary anastomoses, compared to 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Comparative Efficacy of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single-Center Comparative Study

Peng Chen et al.

Summary: This study compared the postoperative outcomes and costs between robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), and explored the learning curve of RDP. The results showed that the RDP group had shorter hospital stay, postoperative first exhaust time, and first feeding time compared to the LDP group, but the cost of RDP was higher. The study also found that the learning curve of RDP significantly decreased after completing 32 cases.

JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING (2022)

Article Surgery

Propensity-Score Matched Analyses Comparing Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomies: A Single-Center Experience

Jaivikash Raghupathy et al.

Summary: This study compared the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent MIDP versus ODP and found that MIDP offers the advantage of shorter postoperative hospital stay, but at the expense of a longer operation time. There were no significant differences noted in other outcomes measured between MIDP and ODP.

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2022)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Impact of spleen preservation on the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: Is less more?

Flavius Sandra-Petrescu et al.

Summary: This study aimed to investigate the impact of splenectomy on perioperative outcome in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy. The results showed that preservation of the spleen reduces the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula and leads to shorter hospital stay and fewer readmissions.

PANCREATOLOGY (2022)

Article Surgery

Benchmarking of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy: European multicentre study

Alessandro Giani et al.

Summary: The study aimed to assess the best achievable outcomes in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy using the Achievable Benchmark of Care method. The results showed that the benchmark values obtained using the ABC method represented optimal outcomes, including low complication rates and zero mortality. These benchmarks can be used to set standards and improve patient outcomes.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2022)

Article Surgery

Cost-effectiveness and quality of life analysis of laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study

Matteo De Pastena et al.

Summary: This study analyzed the Quality of Life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic (LDP) versus robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), finding that robotic surgery was associated with improvement in specific domains of QoL but higher costs relative to laparoscopic surgery. Robotic surgery may be more cost-effective when a willingness to pay of more than 4800 Euros/QALY was accepted, indicating potential benefits in certain circumstances.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2021)

Article Surgery

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Asmita Chopra et al.

Summary: The study compared the outcomes of different surgical approaches (RDP, LDP, and ODP) in the treatment of PDAC patients, showing no significant differences in baseline characteristics and postoperative complications among the three approaches. The different surgical approaches did not have a significant impact on overall survival rates.

UPDATES IN SURGERY (2021)

Review Surgery

Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review

Kai Siang Chan et al.

Summary: This study provides a detailed summary of the current evidence on the learning curve in minimally invasive pancreatic resection, showing no significant difference between the learning curve for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, and robotic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. These findings are limited by the retrospective nature and heterogeneity of the studies published to date.

SURGERY (2021)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Assessment of difficulty in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: A modification of the Japanese difficulty scoring system - A single-center high-volume experience

Giacomo Deiro et al.

Summary: The study validated a modified difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in a European high-volume center, which better stratified the complexity of pancreatic procedures and allowed for appropriate preoperative evaluation of surgical difficulty. Future prospective studies are needed to further validate this new scoring system.

JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES (2021)

Article Oncology

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Qingbo Feng et al.

Summary: This meta-analysis found no significant differences in operative time, tumor size, and lymph node dissection between RDP and LDP, but RDP may have a higher R0 resection rate compared to LDP.

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY (2021)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Robotic versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gianluca Rompianesi et al.

Summary: The study compared the spleen preservation rates of spleen-preserving minimally invasive robotic distal pancreatectomy (SP-RADP) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (SP-LADP). It found that SP-RADP had superior results in spleen preservation, reduced open conversion rate, blood loss, and hospital length of stay compared to SP-LADP, while having similar rates of postoperative complications.

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE (2021)

Article Surgery

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis

S. Lof et al.

Summary: A multicentre international propensity score-matched study found that there was no significant difference in major morbidity rates between robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). However, RDP showed better conversion rates, spleen preservation rates, and readmission rates compared to LDP.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2021)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes comparing robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

Yong-hao Hu et al.

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH (2020)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Preoperative predictive factors of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy difficulty

Stefano Partelli et al.

Review Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery

Hiromichi Kawaida et al.

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY (2019)

Article Surgery

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left pancreatectomy at a high-volume, minimally invasive center

William B. Lyman et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2019)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range

Dehui Luo et al.

STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2018)

Review Surgery

Review of emerging surgical robotic technology

Brian S. Peters et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2018)

Article Surgery

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis

Regis Souche et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2018)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Difficulty scoring system in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

Takao Ohtsuka et al.

JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES (2018)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Which method of distal pancreatectomy is cost-effective among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery?

Maylis Rodriguez et al.

HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION (2018)

Article Surgery

A comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

Brian K. P. Goh et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY (2017)

Article Oncology

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: A propensity score-matched study

Rong Liu et al.

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2017)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Robotic-Assisted Approach Improves Vessel Preservation in Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy

Sabine Eckhardt et al.

DIGESTIVE SURGERY (2016)

Article Surgery

Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single Institution's Experience in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches

Ser Yee Lee et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS (2015)

Article Surgery

A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy

Giovanni Butturini et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2015)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range

Xiang Wan et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2014)

Article Surgery

Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center

Hipolito Duran et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY (2014)

Review Surgery

Benefits and risks of splenectomy

Elroy P. Weledji

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2014)

Review Surgery

Overwhelming post splenectomy infection syndrome - Review study

Prabhu Dayal Sinwar

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2014)

Article Surgery

Short-term perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

Emmanuel I. Benizri et al.

JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY (2014)

Article Surgery

Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages?

Chang Moo Kang et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2011)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

David Moher et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2009)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

JPT Higgins et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2003)