4.6 Article

First-Principles Study of Structural and Electronic Properties of Monolayer PtX2 and Janus PtXY (X, Y = S, Se, and Te) via Strain Engineering

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 5715-5721

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07271

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structural parameters and electronic properties of PTX2 and Janus PtXY were studied using density functional theory. The results showed that these monolayers are stable and highly flexible materials with outstanding stretchability. The electronic properties of these materials can be modulated by applying compressive or tensile strain, and a transition from indirect to quasi-direct semiconductor was observed under tensile strain.
In this work, the structural parameters and electronic properties of PTX2 and Janus PtXY (X, Y = S, Se, and Te) are studied based on the density functional theory. The phonon spectra and the Born criteria of the elastic constant of these six monolayers confirm their stability. All PtX2 and Janus PtXY monolayers show an outstanding stretchability with Young's modulus ranging from 61.023 to 82.124 N/m, about one-fifth that of graphene and half that of MoS2, suggesting highly flexible materials. Our first-principles calculations reveal that the pristine PtX2 and their Janus counterparts are indirect semiconductors with their band gap ranging from 0.760 to 1.810 eV at the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof level (1.128-2.580 eV at the Heyd- Scuseria-Ernzerhof level). By applying biaxial compressive and tensile strain, the electronic properties of all PtX2 and Janus PtXY monolayers are widely tunable. Under small compressive strain, PtX2 and Janus PtXY structures remain indirect semiconductors. PtTe2, PtSeTe, and PtSTe monolayers undergo a semiconducting to metallic transition when the strain reaches -6, -8, and -10%, respectively. Interestingly, there is a transition from the indirect semiconductor to a quasi-direct one for all PtX2 and Janus PtXY monolayers when the tensile strain is applied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据