4.6 Article

Molecular Simulation of Methane Adsorption Properties of Coal Samples with Different Coal Rank Superposition States

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 3461-3469

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07471

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, adsorption simulations were conducted to investigate the amount and control mechanism of methane adsorbed by different coal rank coals. The results showed that the adsorption of methane was mainly concentrated in the effective pores of coal molecules, and the isosteric heat exhibited an exponential relationship with adsorption pressure.
Obvious differences exist in the structures of different coal rank coals, resulting in many differences and similarities in the amount of methane (CH4) gas adsorbed by coal and the control mechanism. In this study, we conducted adsorption simulations of three different coal rank coals in the superposition state using the Materials Studio software with simulated temperatures of 293.15, 313.15, and 333.15 K and adsorption pressures ranging from 0 to 10 MPa. We used the grand canonical ensemble Monte Carlo calculation method to calculate and study the adsorption amount, adsorption process, isosteric heat, and diffusion coefficient of CH4 in detail. We found that the adsorption of CH4 by coal samples of three coal rank coals (i.e., anthracite, bituminous coal, and lignite), which were mixed and stacked separately, was concentrated in the effective pores of coal molecules. Their effect on the amount of CH4 adsorption was dominated by the coal samples with more effective pores in the coal molecules. The isosteric heat of the coal samples showed an obvious exponential relationship with the adsorption pressure, and the isosteric heat of coal samples as a nonhomogeneous adsorbent gradually decreased with an increase in adsorption pressure. During the transformation of free-state CH4 into an adsorbed state, we obtained the best adsorption effect for bituminous-lignite superposition-state coal samples, and the diffusion coefficient of CH4 was the lowest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据