4.7 Review

Abutilon theophrasti's Resilience against Allelochemical-Based Weed Management in Sustainable Agriculture - Due to Collection of Highly Advantageous Microorganisms?

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants12040700

关键词

Abutilon theophrasti; biological control; allelopathy; fungi; bacteria; secondary metabolites; benzoxazinoids; rye mulch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (velvetleaf) is a problematic invasive weed in temperate regions, causing significant yield losses in field crops. Biological methods, including microorganisms releasing phytotoxins and allelochemicals, have been attempted for weed management. However, these methods are still unreliable in terms of intensity and duration.
Abutilon theophrasti Medik. (velvetleaf) is a problematic annual weed in field crops which has invaded many temperate parts of the world. Since the loss of crop yields can be extensive, approaches to manage the weed include not only conventional methods, but also biological methods, for instance by microorganisms releasing phytotoxins and plant-derived allelochemicals. Additionally, benzoxazinoid-rich rye mulches effective in managing common weeds like Amaranthus retroflexus L. have been tested for this purpose. However, recent methods for biological control are still unreliable in terms of intensity and duration. Rye mulches were also ineffective in managing velvetleaf. In this review, we present the attempts to reduce velvetleaf infestation by biological methods and discuss possible reasons for the failure. The resilience of velvetleaf may be due to the extraordinary capacity of the plant to collect, for its own survival, the most suitable microorganisms from a given farming site, genetic and epigenetic adaptations, and a high stress memory. Such properties may have developed together with other advantageous abilities during selection by humans when the plant was used as a crop. Rewilding could be responsible for improving the microbiomes of A. theophrasti.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据