4.7 Article

Asplenium pseudocapillipes (Aspleniaceae), a New Fern Species from South Korea

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants11223089

关键词

Asplenium pseudocapillipes; new species; allotetraploid; Asplenium tenuicaule; Asplenium capillipes

资金

  1. National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR) - Korea Government [NIBR202212101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new allotetraploid species, A. pseudocapillipes, originating from the hybridization between A. capillipes and A. tenuicaule, is discovered in limestone areas of South Korea. Molecular and cytological analyses confirm the maternal origin from A. capillipes and the presence of genotypes from both parent species. The leaf characteristics and absence of gemma are intermediate between the parental species. Although having 32 spores per sporangium, A. pseudocapillipes is considered to be a sexually reproducing fern.
A new allotetraploid species of the genus Asplenium, A. pseudocapillipes, originated from the hybridization between A. capillipes and A. tenuicaule, has been newly discovered in two limestone areas of South Korea. A molecular phylogenetic analysis using one chloroplast region (rbcL) and three single- or low-copy nuclear regions (AK1, gapCp, pgiC) and a cytological analysis, including genome size measurements, were conducted to characterize this new species. From these results, the maternal origin of A. pseudocapillipes was confirmed to be A. capillipes, which has never been reported in Korea. All three nuclear data showed that this new species had genotypes of both A. capillipes and A. tenuicaule. The quantitative characteristics of the leaves showed values intermediate between the two parental species. The absence of gemma accorded with its paternal origin from A. tenuicaule, and 32 spores per sporangium accorded with its maternal origin from A. capillipes. Although A. pseudocapillipes has 32 spores per sporangium, it is considered to be a sexually reproducing, not an apomitic, fern.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据