4.7 Article

Effect of Induced Mechanical Leaf Damage on the Yield and Content of Bioactive Molecules in Leaves and Seeds of Tepary Beans (Phaseolus acutifolius)

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants11243538

关键词

Tepary beans; lectins; protease inhibitors; foliar stress; phenolic compounds

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT) of Mexico [171873]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growing interest in Tepary beans is due to their cytotoxic effects on human cancer cells. Mechanical foliar damage increases lectin content in the seeds, but does not affect enzyme activity or phenolic compound levels in the leaves. However, it does reduce seed production.
Growing interest has recently been shown in Tepary beans (Phaseolus acutifolius) because they contain lectins and protease inhibitors that have been shown to have a specific cytotoxic effect on human cancer cells. Bean lectins offer protection against biotic and abiotic stress factors, so it is possible that mechanical foliar damage may increase lectin production. This study evaluates the effect of mechanical stress (foliar damage) on lectin and protease inhibitor content in Tepary beans. Seed yield was also analyzed, and phenolic content and antioxidant capacity (DPPH and TEAC) were determined in the leaves. An experimental design with random blocks of three treatments (T1: control group, T2: 50% mechanical foliar damage and T3: 80% mechanical foliar damage) was carried out. Mechanical foliar damage increased the amount of lectin binding units (LBUs) fivefold (from 1280 to 6542 LBUs in T3) but did not affect units of enzymatic activity (UEA) against trypsin (from 60.8 to 51 UEA in T3). Results show that controlled mechanical foliar damage could be used to induce overexpression of lectins in the seeds of Tepary beans. Mechanical foliar damage reduced seed production (-14.6%: from 1890 g to 1615 g in T3) and did not significantly increase phenolic compound levels in leaves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据