4.5 Article

Burdens and Resources of Staff of a Specialized Ward for Neuropalliative Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey

期刊

BRAIN SCIENCES
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12121697

关键词

palliative care; neurology; care giver burden; resilience; resources; communication

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Palliative care poses significant burdens to healthcare workers, with additional challenges in neuropalliative care including patient symptom burdens and impairments. Results of the study showed that NPC physicians and nursing staff did not differ significantly from other neurological wards in terms of perceived burden and stressful deaths, with the circumstances of dying impacting distress perception. Resources mentioned were similar between groups, with team support and personal life being most important. Communication difficulties were often cited as stressful, while successful communication was seen as a valuable resource.
Palliative care adds significant burdens to healthcare workers. In neuropalliative care (NPC), additional challenges include patient symptom burdens, such as impairments in mobility, cognition, and communication. After one year of operating the first NPC ward in Germany, we assessed burdens, resources, and the number of deaths perceived as stressful. NPC physicians and nursing staff were compared with the team of other neurological wards, including a stroke unit. The assessment took place between March 2022 and May 2022. All 64 team members were contacted; the responder rate was 81%. The perceived burden was high but did not differ between groups. There were no differences between the NPC- and the neurological wards in the number of deaths perceived as stressful. However, rather than the number of deaths, the circumstances of dying influence the perceived distress. The resources mentioned were similar between groups, with the team and private life being most important. Communication difficulties were frequently cited as stressful, whereas successful communication was identified as a resource.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据