4.6 Article

Study on soil freezing characteristic curve during a freezing-thawing process

期刊

FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2022.1007342

关键词

unfrozen water content; soil freezing characteristic curve; freezing-thawing process; hysteresis behavior; freezing point

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Soil Freezing Characteristic Curve (SFCC) describes the relationship between unfrozen water content and subzero temperature. This study investigated the impacts of initial water content, dry density, soil type, and desalination on SFCC during freezing-thawing process. Results showed that initial water content, soil type, and desalination greatly influenced SFCC, while dry density had little effect. Hysteresis behavior was observed in all soil samples, more obvious in the temperature range of -5°C < T < 0°C.
Soil freezing characteristic curve (SFCC) defines the relationship between unfrozen water content and subzero temperature. The SFCC is widely applied to estimate the soil properties. The current study explored the effects of initial water content, dry density, soil type and desalination on the SFCC during a freezing-thawing process. It showed that the initial water content, soil type and desalination had great impacts on SFCC, while the dry density had an insignificant effect on SFCC. Hysteresis behavior was observed for all the soil samples. The hysteresis behavior was obvious in the temperature range of-5 degrees C < T < 0, but not obvious in the temperature range of T <= -10 degrees C. A new equation containing freezing/thawing point was proposed to model the SFCC. The new model and four SFCC models were evaluated with measured data in this study. It showed that the new model performed best among these models. The new model accurately mimics the SFCC and is continuous near the freezing/thawing point and 0 degrees C. It can be easily incorporated into numerical algorithms for coupled heat and mass transfer in cold regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据