4.6 Article

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of Rare Anaerobic Bacteria

期刊

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12010063

关键词

antimicrobial susceptibility; anaerobic bacteria; E-test; agar dilution method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anaerobes play a crucial role in clinically relevant infections and their resistance is becoming more widespread. In this study, 120 rare anaerobic isolates from 16 genera were tested for antimicrobial resistance using two different methods. Results showed low resistance to certain antibiotics, while moderate to high rates of resistance were observed for others, depending on the testing methodology. The findings highlight the importance of routine susceptibility testing and further investigations are needed to improve testing for fastidious anaerobes.
Anaerobes play an important role in clinically relevant infections and resistance is increasing worldwide. We tested 120 rare anaerobic isolates belonging to 16 genera for antimicrobial resistance using the agar dilution method and compared those results to the time-saving E-test method. The susceptibility data for 12 antimicrobial substances (benzylpenicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem, cefoxitin, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, clindamycin, doxycycline, tigecycline, eravacycline) were collected. Susceptibility testing showed low resistance to beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and no resistance to carbapenems and tigecycline. We observed moderate to high rates of resistance to moxifloxacin and clindamycin which differed depending on the methodology used. The essential and categorical agreement was over 90% for ampicillin/sulbactam, meropenem, moxifloxacin, and tigecycline. For metronidazole and clindamycin, the essential agreement was below 90% but the categorical agreement was near or above 90%. Penicillin presented with the lowest categorical agreement of 86.7% and a very high very major error rate of 13.3%. The resistance rates reported in this study are concerning and show the importance of routine susceptibility testing. Further investigations are necessary to determine the reason for high error rates and how to improve susceptibility testing of fastidious anaerobes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据