4.7 Article

Occurrenceand characteristics of microplastics in benthic species from mangrove wetlands of Hainan, South China

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2023.965059

关键词

microplastics; mangrove wetland; invertebrates; contaminates; Hainan Island

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the abundance and characteristics of microplastics (MPs) in benthic organisms from mangrove wetlands in Hainan, South China. The study finds that MPs are widely distributed among different species, with fibers being the most common type of MPs. The most dominant polymer found in the MPs is polypropylene. Crabs show a higher potential for accumulating MPs compared to other species.
Microplastics (MPs) are emerging contaminants that pose a global threat to the environment. Mangrove ecosystems, which contribute to biogeochemical cycles, are vulnerable to various anthropogenic disturbances and chemical pollutants. In this study, the abundance and the characteristics of MPs were investigated in 10 species of benthic organisms, including crabs, bivalves, and snails, from seven typical mangrove distribution areas, with a total of 15 sampling sites in Hainan, South China. The abundance of MPs in each sampling site ranged between 0.83 +/- 1.32 and 12.00 +/- 0.00 items/individual, with an average of 3.90 +/- 3.31 items/individual, while the abundance of MPs varied between 0.17 and 2.00 items/individual for the different species. Fibers (80.13%) were the most abundant MPs, most of the MPs were brown (37.18%) or blue (26.64%), and more than 80% were small-sized plastic (<2 mm). Raman analysis showed that polypropylene (94.44%) was the most dominant type of polymer. In addition, crabs (with an average abundance of 1.10 +/- 0.59 items/individual) showed a higher potential for accumulating MPs than the other species investigated in the present study. This study shows that MPs are widely distributed throughout benthic species in the mangrove wetlands of Hainan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据