4.7 Article

A significant assessment of two unequal classes of chemical reaction for the incompressible flow

期刊

AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2022.102033

关键词

Fractional derivatives; Chemical Reaction; Darcy Medium; Unequal diffusivities; Numerical analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article numerically investigates the time-dependent fractional non-Newtonian fluid model on a vertical plane in a Darcy medium. A generalized Scott-Bliar model is employed to control the flow and mass transfer in the boundary layer region. The analysis shows that the fractional exponent significantly affects the concentration of chemical species and provides insights into the chemical process in the fractional Casson fluid model.
The current article numerically investigates the time-dependent fractional non-Newtonian fluid model on a vertical plane in a Darcy medium. A generalized Scott-Bliar model with heterogeneous and homogeneous interaction is employed to control the flow and mass transfer in the boundary layer region. Chemical reactions in flow are responsible for variable concentration, which causes long-lasting chemical species to better understand the chemical process.The highly nonlinear coupled model is discretized using the finite difference method with the L1 technique. The current analysis shows that the fractional exponent significantly affects the concentration of chemical species. It also revealed during the studies that for maximum values of Kr and d1 the concentration of chemical species for a reduces. Currently no such result in the literary works for the non-integer fractional Casson model. This analysis is help full to understand the chemical process in fractional Casson fluid model.(c) 2022 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据