4.7 Review

The state-of-the-art knowledge, techniques, and simulation programs for quantifying human visual comfort in mosque buildings: A systematic review

期刊

AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2023.102128

关键词

Visual comfort; Daylight; Visual perception; Mosque typo-morphology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human thought and the environment interact to create a synthesis of visual quality, and spatial characteristics of space affect human perception and indoor visual components in mosque architecture. The study identified knowledge gaps in the complex relationship between mosque typo morphology and the visual comfort of worshippers.
Human thought and the environment interact to create a synthesis of visual quality. Spatial characteris-tics of space affect human perception and indoor visual components. To review a wide range of knowl-edge, a systematic review of visual comfort assessment and recent developments in mosque architecture was conducted. Apart from effective-physical design and socio-emotional aspects related to visual com-fort in mosque buildings, the most relevant methods, techniques, and measurement tools were exam-ined. Current research identified all eligible studies through systematic searching as an essential component of a systematic review. State-of-the-art reviewed the latest knowledge, methodologies, tools, and techniques related to the research topic, highlighting priority areas, visual comfort standardization, and their importance to mosque architecture. The research found knowledge gaps about the complicated relationship between mosque typo morphology and the visual comfort of worshippers. Thus, exhaustive and in-depth methodologies and comparisons between previous studies can help bridge knowledge gaps on such crucial topics.(c) 2023 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams Uni-versity. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据