4.7 Article

A comparative evaluation of reverse osmosis membrane performance when combined with anaerobic or aerobic membrane bioreactors for indirect potable reuse applications

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103295

关键词

Aerobic; Anaerobic; Fouling; membrane bioreactor; Reverse osmosis; Water reuse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The filtration performance and fouling behavior of reverse osmosis membranes were investigated for the post-treatment of MBR effluents treating municipal wastewater. The study found that the combination of AnMBR with RO offers a more sustainable approach than with AeMBR, although it led to more fouling. RO can effectively remove disinfection by-products pre-cursors and achieve a water quality sufficient for indirect potable water reuse. Nutrients removal before RO membranes is recommended to limit fouling propensity and achieve a permeate of sufficient quality.
The filtration performance and fouling behaviour of reverse osmosis (RO) membranes was investigated for the post-treatment of aerobic (Ae) and anaerobic (An) MBR effluents treating municipal wastewater for potable reuse. Both MBR effluents followed by RO can produce a water quality sufficient for indirect potable water reuse, while fluorescence excitation-emission scan suggests RO can effectively remove disinfection by-products pre-cursors, ensuring the safety for chlorine based reuse water distribution by rejecting the dissolved organic matters in MBR effluents. AnMBR effluent leads to more fouling when compared to the AeMBR effluent with an average membrane fouling resistance of 12.35 x 1013 m-1 and 8.97 x 1013 m-1. Elemental analysis and membrane surface imaging results demonstrate that the foulant deposition sequence is organic and colloidal at first, fol-lowed by inorganic substances, while TOC and Ca are the most deposited foulants from both effluents. The unremoved ammonia in the AnMBR effluent may partially go through in the RO permeate and exceed the threshold in Singapore's PUB NEWater standard, while experiencing a significantly higher deposition rate of 13.8 % than the nitrate (0.02 %) from the AeMBR effluent. The findings suggest that the combination of AnMBR with RO offers a more sustainable approach than with the AeMBR but nutrients removal, with the potential of recovery, is recommended before the RO membranes to limit the fouling propensity and achieve a permeate of sufficient quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据