4.6 Article

Alteration of Autophagy and Glial Activity in Nilotinib-Treated Huntington's Disease Patients

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo12121225

关键词

nilotinib; Huntington's; DDR1; dopamine; miRNA; autophagy; inflammation; basal ganglia

资金

  1. Cures Within Reach Foundation
  2. Georgetown University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nilotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, affects dopamine transmission and gene expression, but does not significantly improve behavioral and motor symptoms in HD patients. CSF miRNA sequencing reveals changes in specific genes associated with neurotransmitters in the basal ganglia.
Nilotinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is safe and tolerated in neurodegeneration, it achieves CSF concentration that is adequate to inhibit discoidin domain receptor (DDR)-1. Nilotinib significantly affects dopamine metabolites, including Homovanillic acid (HVA), resulting in an increase in brain dopamine. HD is a hereditary disease caused by mutations in the Huntingtin's (HTT) gene and characterized by neurodegeneration and motor and behavioral symptoms that are associated with activation of dopamine receptors. We explored the effects of a low dose of nilotinib (150 mg) on behavioral changes and motor symptoms in manifest HD patients and examined the effects of nilotinib on several brain mechanisms, including dopamine transmission and gene expression via cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) miRNA sequencing. Nilotinib, 150 mg, did not result in any behavioral changes, although it significantly attenuated HVA levels, suggesting reduction of dopamine catabolism. There was no significant change in HTT, phosphorylated neuro-filament and inflammatory markers in the CSF and plasma via immunoassays. Whole miRNA genome sequencing of the CSF revealed significant longitudinal changes in miRNAs that control specific genes associated with autophagy, inflammation, microglial activity and basal ganglia neurotransmitters, including dopamine and serotonin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据