4.5 Article

Characterization of a New Temperate Escherichia coli Phage vB_EcoP_ZX5 and Its Regulatory Protein

期刊

PATHOGENS
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11121445

关键词

temperate phage; biological characteristics; genomic analysis; lytic-lysogenic; virulence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on the interaction between temperate phages and bacteria, emphasizing the importance of understanding their role in human diseases. A new temperate Escherichia coli phage, vB_EcoP_ZX5, was isolated and characterized, providing insights into its integration and transmission mechanism in E. coli. The study highlights the crucial role of repressor proteins in controlling the lytic-lysogenic cycle of the phage.
The study of the interaction between temperate phages and bacteria is vital to understand their role in the development of human diseases. In this study, a novel temperate Escherichia coli phage, vB_EcoP_ZX5, with a genome size of 39,565 bp, was isolated from human fecal samples. It has a short tail and belongs to the genus Uetakevirus and the family Podoviridae. Phage vB_EcoP_ZX5 encodes three lysogeny-related proteins (ORF12, ORF21, and ORF4) and can be integrated into the 3 '-end of guaA of its host E. coli YO1 for stable transmission to offspring bacteria. Phage vB_EcoP_ZX5 in lysogenized E. coli YO1+ was induced spontaneously, with a free phage titer of 10(7) PFU/mL. The integration of vB_EcoP_ZX5 had no significant effect on growth, biofilm, environmental stress response, antibiotic sensitivity, adherence to HeLa cells, and virulence of E. coli YO1. The ORF4 anti-repressor, ORF12 integrase, and ORF21 repressors that affect the lytic-lysogenic cycle of vB_EcoP_ZX5 were verified by protein overexpression. We could tell from changes of the number of total phages and the transcription level of phage genes that repressor protein is the key determinant of lytic-to-lysogenic conversion, and anti-repressor protein promotes the conversion from lysogenic cycle to lytic cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据