4.7 Article

Study on the limiting factors of the cycle life of alkaline poly(vinyl alcohol)-based zinc-air batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.106202

关键词

Flexible zinc-air batteries; Limiting factors; Cycle life; Poly(vinyl alcohol); Gel polymer electrolytes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flexible zinc-air batteries (FZABs) based on poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) alkaline gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) have poor cycling life, mainly due to the decline of the OH- ion content in the PVA-KOH GPE. Factors such as the formation of ZnO and carbonate in the GPE, as well as its poor water retention capability, contribute to the decrease in OH- ion content. This study provides valuable theoretical guidance and reference for prolonging the cycle lifetime of FZABs using PVA-KOH GPE.
Flexible zinc-air batteries (FZABs) arouse extensive research interests due to their high energy density and extremely low cost. However, FZABs based on poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) alkaline gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) suffer from poor cycling life, which seriously hinders their commercial application. Although most previous efforts focus on optimizing and developing the electrodes and the electrolyte materials with high electrochemical performance to improve the battery cycle life, the limiting factors of the cycle life of the FZAB remain obscure. Herein, a PVA-KOH-based FZAB was assembled to explore the limiting factors of the battery cycle lifespan by setting an array of comparative experiments. The results demonstrate that the decline of the OH- ion content in the PVA-KOH GPE is the key factor in shortening the battery cycle life. The ZnO and carbonate formation in the GPE as well as the poor water retention capability of the GPE contribute to the decrease of OH- ion content in the PVA-KOH GPE. Due to the widely used PVA-KOH GPE in FZABs, this work can provide valuable theoretical guidance and reference for most of the research works centered on prolonging the cycle lifetime of the FZABs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据