4.7 Article

Influence of heteroatom doping on the quantum capacitance of phosphorene supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.106013

关键词

Phosphorene; Supercapacitors; Density functional theory; Quantum capacitance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the modulation of quantum capacitance of monolayer phosphorene with dopants using first-principles density functional theory calculations. The results show that Si-doped phosphorene is the most stable system, while Ti-doped system exhibits the highest value of quantum capacitance.
The focus is on new energy storage technologies that can serve as a reliable replacement for lithium-ion batteries and other traditional energy storage devices. In this context, 2D materials-based supercapacitors have recently drawn a lot of attention due to the plethora of available layered materials as well as their enhanced electro-chemical performance. Using first-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations, this study investigates the modulation of the quantum capacitance of monolayer phosphorene in the presence of a semi-metal (Si), a reactive non-metal (S) and two transition metals (Ti, Ni) dopants and compares it to the pristine monolayer phosphorene. The binding energies of the doped systems depict structural stability for all doped systems. The most stable system is discovered to be Si-doped phosphorene with binding energy of-7.44 eV/atom. The band structure and density of states computations are used to study the electronic characteristics of doped and undoped monolayer phosphorene lattices. The Ti doped system shows the highest value of quantum capacitance (92.1 mu F/cm2 at 0.4 V). The results portrayed through this study provide a detailed understanding to enhance the quantum capacitance of phosphorene and shows a promising pathway for phosphorene-based electrode materials for supercapacitors, which are assessed using first-principles density-functional theory calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据