4.6 Article

Human Adenovirus and Influenza A Virus Exacerbate SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Animal Models

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11010180

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; influenza A virus; human adenovirus 5; coinfection; ferret; hamster

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the features of simultaneous and sequential co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and human adenovirus type 5 (HAdV-5) or influenza A virus (IAV) were investigated in vitro and in vivo. It was found that HAdV-5 infection does not interfere with SARS-CoV-2 replication and co-infection with IAV results in more severe clinical manifestations and lung pathology. The expression of interferon and cytokine signaling pathway genes was also upregulated in co-infected animals compared to those infected with SARS-CoV-2 alone.
In this study, we investigated the features of the infectious process by simulating co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and human adenovirus type 5 (HAdV-5) or influenza A virus (IAV) in vitro and in vivo. The determination of infectious activity of viruses and digital PCR demonstrated that during simultaneous and sequential HAdV-5 followed by SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro and in vivo, the HAdV-5 infection does not interfere with replication of SARS-CoV-2. The hamsters co-infected and mono-infected with SARS-CoV-2 exhibited nearly identical viral titers and viral loads of SARS-CoV-2 in the lungs. The hamsters and ferrets co-infected by SARS-CoV-2- and IAV demonstrated more pronounced clinical manifestations than mono-infected animals. Additionally, the lung histological data illustrate that HAdV-5 or IAV and SARS-CoV-2 co-infection induces more severe pathological changes in the lungs than mono-infection. The expression of several genes specific to interferon and cytokine signaling pathways in the lungs of co-infected hamsters was more upregulated compared to single infected with SARS-CoV-2 animals. Thus, co-infection with HAdV-5 or IAV and SARS-CoV-2 leads to more severe pulmonary disease in animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据