4.6 Review

Probiotics in Functional Dyspepsia

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11020351

关键词

probiotics; functional; dyspepsia; treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common disorder with no definitive, universal treatment. Probiotics have been suggested as a potential therapeutic option for FD due to their effects on gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). However, the evidence for the efficacy of probiotics in FD remains unclear. This review aims to summarize the available evidence for the use of probiotics in FD.
Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common disorder in everyday clinical practice identified nowadays as a multi-factorial, difficult to treat condition with a significant burden on patients' quality of life (QoL) and healthcare systems worldwide. Despite its high prevalence in the general population, the precise etiology of the disorder remains elusive, with its pathophysiological spectrum evolving over time, including variable potential mechanisms, i.e., impaired gastric accommodation, gastric motor disorders, hypersensitivity to gastric distention, disorders of the brain-gut axis, as well as less evident ones, i.e., altered duodenal microbiota composition and genetic susceptibility. In light of these implications, a definitive, universal treatment that could be beneficial for all FD patients is not available yet. Recently, probiotics have been suggested to be an effective therapeutic option that could alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), potentially due to anti-inflammatory properties or by modulating the complex bidirectional interactions between gastrointestinal microbiota and host crosstalk; however, their impact on the multiple aspects of FD remains ambiguous. In this review, we aim to summarize all currently available evidence for the efficacy of probiotics as a novel therapeutic approach for FD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据