4.6 Article

Antimicrobial Resistance and Mechanisms of Azithromycin Resistance in Nontyphoidal Salmonella Isolates in Taiwan, 2017 to 2018

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03364-22

关键词

Salmonella; nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS); antimicrobial resistance; azithromycin; mechanisms of azithromycin resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated antimicrobial resistance in non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates from humans in Taiwan and identified the genetic determinants of azithromycin resistance. The study revealed that nearly half of the isolates were multidrug-resistant and 20% were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. The rate of azithromycin resistance in Taiwan's NTS isolates was higher than that in the United States and Europe. The study also found that azithromycin resistance was primarily mediated by mph(A), erm(42), erm(B), and ramAp, which are frequently carried on mobile genetic elements, indicating a potential dissemination of these resistance determinants among different bacterial pathogens.
Antimicrobial resistance was investigated in 2,341 nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) isolates recovered from humans in Taiwan from 2017 to 2018 using antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Azithromycin resistance determinants were detected in 175 selected isolates using PCR and confirmed in 81 selected isolates using whole-genome sequencing. Multidrug resistance was found in 47.3% of total isolates and 96.2% of Salmonella enterica serovar Anatum and 81.7% of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium isolates. Resistance to the conventional first-line drugs (ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole), cefotaxime and ceftazidime, and ciprofloxacin was found in 32.5 to 49.0%, 20.3 to 20.4%, and 3.2% of isolates, respectively. A total of 76 (3.1%) isolates were resistant to azithromycin, which was associated with mph(A), erm(42), erm(B), and possibly the enhanced expression of efflux pump(s) due to ramAp or defective ramR. mph(A) was found in 53% of the 76 azithromycin-resistant isolates from 11 serovars and located in an IS26-mph(A)-mrx(A)-mphR(A)-IS6100 unit in various incompatibility plasmids and the chromosomes. erm(42) in S. enterica serovar Albany was carried by an integrative and conjugative element, ICE_erm42, and in S. enterica serovar Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium was located in IS26 composite transposons in the chromosomes. erm(B) was carried by IncI1-I(alpha) plasmids in S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium. ramAp was a plasmid-borne ramA, a regulatory activator of efflux pump(s), found in only S. enterica serovar Goldcoast. Since the azithromycin resistance determinants are primarily carried on mobile genetic elements, they could easily be disseminated among human bacterial pathogens. The ramAp-carrying S. Goldcoast isolates displayed azithromycin MICs of 16 to 32mg/L. Thus, the epidemiological cutoff value of <= 16mg/L of azithromycin proposed for wild-type NTS should be reconsidered. IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial resistance in NTS isolates is a major public health concern in Taiwan, and the mechanisms of azithromycin resistance are rarely investigated. Azithromycin and carbapenems are the last resort for the treatment of invasive salmonellosis caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant Salmonella strains. Our study reports the epidemiological trend of resistance in NTS in Taiwan and the genetic determinants involved in azithromycin resistance. We point out that nearly half of NTS isolates from 2017 to 2018 are MDR, and 20% are resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. The azithromycin resistance rate (3.1%) for the NTS isolates from Taiwan is much higher than those for the NTS isolates from the United States and Europe. Our study also indicates that azithromycin resistance is primarily mediated by mph(A), erm(42), erm(B), and ramAp, which are frequently carried on mobile genetic elements. Thus, the azithromycin resistance determinants could be expected to be disseminated among diverse bacterial pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据