Evaluation of BioFire Respiratory Panel 2 plus for Detection of Bordetella pertussis in Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens from Children with Clinically Suspected Pertussis

In recent years, there have been some epidemic or local outbreaks of pertussis in countries with high vaccination rates. One of the crucial factors in controlling pertussis is early diagnosis, which is based on specific laboratory measurements, including culture, serological tests, and PCR assays. The objective of this study was to compare the performances of BioFire Respiratory Panel 2 (RP2) plus, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and culture for the detection of Bordetella pertussis in nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens. Consecutive NPS specimens were collected from patients with clinically suspected pertussis from 1 March 1 to 31 July 2018 in Shenzhen Children's Hospital. All the specimens were tested in parallel by RP2 plus, qPCR, and culture methods. A total of 464 children were enrolled in this study. The positive pertussis rates of culture, RP2 plus, and qPCR were 23.1%, 39.0%, and 38.4%, respectively. Compared to the combined reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were, respectively, 56.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.2 to 63.7%), 100% (98.3 to 100%), 100% (95.7 to 100%), and 77.0% (72.2 to 81.2%) for culture, 89.9% (84.5 to 93.7%), 96.0% (92.8 to 97.9%), 93.9% (89.1 to 96.8%), and 93.3% (89.5 to 95.8%) for RP2 plus, and 86.8% (80.9 to 91.1%), 94.9% (91.4 to 97.1%), 92.1% (86.9 to 95.5%), and 91.3% (87.2 to 94.2%) for qPCR. The most prevalent codetected pathogen was human rhinovirus/enterovirus (n = 99, 52.4%), followed by parainfluenza virus (n =32, 16.9%) and respiratory syncytial virus (n = 29, 15.3%), in children with B. pertussis present, which was consistent with the top three pathogens previously found in children with B. pertussis absent. Turnaround times for RP2 plus, qPCR, and culture were 2 h, 8 h, and 120 h, respectively. RP2 plus quickly and accurately detected B. pertussis, providing valuable information for an early clinical diagnosis and optimal choice of therapy.IMPORTANCE In recent years, there have been some epidemic or local outbreaks of pertussis in countries with high vaccination rates. One of the crucial factors in controlling pertussis is early diagnosis, which is based on specific laboratory measurements, including culture, serological tests, and PCR assays. Compared to culture and serological tests, PCR is more suitable for clinical application, with a fast detection speed of several hours independent of the disease stage and individual vaccination status. BioFire Respiratory Panel 2 plus, a multiplex PCR assay for simultaneously detecting 22 respiratory pathogens, facilitates the quick detection of Bordetella pertussis and coinfecting respiratory pathogens. It also provides valuable information for an early clinical diagnosis and optimal choice of therapy for children with clinically suspected pertussis.

Automated summary

In recent years, there have been outbreaks of pertussis in countries with high vaccination rates. Early diagnosis of pertussis is crucial and is usually done through laboratory measurements such as culture, serological tests, and PCR assays. This study compared the performance of different detection methods and found that BioFire Respiratory Panel 2 plus (RP2) had a higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting Bordetella pertussis compared to culture and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). RP2 also provided quick results, aiding in early diagnosis and treatment decisions.