4.7 Article

Temporally ultralong biphotons with a linewidth of 50 kHz

期刊

APL PHOTONICS
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0102393

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan
  2. [109-2639-M-007-002-ASP]
  3. [110-2639-M-007-001-ASP]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This report presents the generation of biphotons with the longest temporal width and the narrowest spectral linewidth to date. It also demonstrates a highly tunable-linewidth biphoton source and achieves a high-efficiency ultranarrow-linewidth biphoton source. These results are significant for quantum technology utilizing heralded single photons.
We report the generation of biphotons, with a temporal full width at the half maximum (FWHM) of 13.4 &+/- 0.3 mu s and a spectral FWHM of 50 +/- 1 kHz, via the process of spontaneous four-wave mixing with laser-cooled atoms. The temporal width is the longest, and the spectral linewidth is the narrowest to date. This is also the first biphoton result that obtains a linewidth below 100 kHz, reaching a new milestone. The very long biphoton wave packet has a signal-to-background ratio of 3.4, which violates the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for classical light by 4.8 folds. Furthermore, we demonstrated a highly tunable-linewidth biphoton source and showed that while the biphoton source's temporal and spectral width were controllably varied by about 24 folds, its generation rate only changed by less than 15%. A spectral brightness or generation rate per pump power per linewidth of 1.2x 10(6) pairs/(s mW MHz) was achieved at the temporal width of 13.4 mu s. The above results were made possible by the low decoherence rate and high optical depth of the experimental system, as well as a novel scheme of classical fields' and biphotons' propagation directions in the experiment. This work has demonstrated a high-efficiency ultranarrow-linewidth biphoton source and has made substantial advancements in quantum technology utilizing heralded single photons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据