4.7 Article

Characterization of Bioactive Compounds in Lees from New Zealand Wines with Different Vinification Backgrounds

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox11122335

关键词

wine lees; phenolic compounds; antioxidant; antimicrobial activity; vinification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the phenolic compounds and biological activities of wine lees extracts obtained from different vinification sources of Riesling and Pinot Noir. The results showed that the vinification technique altered the composition of phenolic compounds in the lees, rather than the quantity of total phenolics. Pinot Noir lees were found to be better sources of phenolics and antioxidant activity compared to Riesling lees.
Wine lees are one of the main by-products produced during winemaking. Little is known about the effect of the vinification technique on the phenolic compounds and the biological activity of wine lees extracts. Wine lees collected at varying vinification sources of two grape varieties, Riesling (RL) and Pinot Noir (PN), were analyzed for total phenolic content (TPC), tannin content (TTC), their anthocyanin and phenolic profile, and the antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of their extracts. The results showed a low TPC and TTC in RL lees, which could be attributed to the varietal characteristic of RL grapes and to less skin contact during vinification. Vinification techniques modified the composition of the phenolic compounds in the lees. The results showed a good linear relationship between the antioxidant activities and the TPC and TTC, indicating that PN lees were better sources of phenolics and antioxidant activity than RL lees. The antimicrobial activity of wine lees was related to the phenolic composition rather than the quantity of total phenolics. Knowing the grape and wine processing conditions can provide some insights into the potential composition of wine lees and, hence, determine the potential economic use of the by-product.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据