4.7 Review

Human Coronavirus Cell Receptors Provide Challenging Therapeutic Targets

期刊

VACCINES
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11010174

关键词

coronavirus receptor; ANPEP; CD13; DPP-IV; CD26; ACE2; MERS-CoV; SARS-CoV; SARS-CoV-2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coronaviruses use their spike proteins to interact with protein or carbohydrate receptors and infect cells. Three known protein receptors, ANPEP/CD13, DPP IV/CD26, and ACE2, play important roles in the infection of human coronaviruses. These receptors are involved in various physiological processes and expressed in different tissues/cell types. Understanding the commonalities and functions of these enzymes, as well as their impact on systemic deregulations and multi-organ failures, is crucial for developing effective medications against coronaviruses.
Coronaviruses interact with protein or carbohydrate receptors through their spike proteins to infect cells. Even if the known protein receptors for these viruses have no evolutionary relationships, they do share ontological commonalities that the virus might leverage to exacerbate the pathophysiology. ANPEP/CD13, DPP IV/CD26, and ACE2 are the three protein receptors that are known to be exploited by several human coronaviruses. These receptors are moonlighting enzymes involved in several physiological processes such as digestion, metabolism, and blood pressure regulation; moreover, the three proteins are expressed in kidney, intestine, endothelium, and other tissues/cell types. Here, we spot the commonalities between the three enzymes, the physiological functions of the enzymes are outlined, and how blocking either enzyme results in systemic deregulations and multi-organ failures via viral infection or therapeutic interventions is addressed. It can be difficult to pinpoint any coronavirus as the target when creating a medication to fight them, due to the multiple processes that receptors are linked to and their extensive expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据