4.7 Article

Sm-doped CsBr crystal as a new radio-photoluminescence (RPL) material

期刊

JOURNAL OF RARE EARTHS
卷 34, 期 8, 页码 769-773

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0721(16)60092-3

关键词

radio-photoluminescence; RPL; CsBr; Sm; dosimeter; X-rays; rare earths

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of the Japanese Government (MEXT) [26249147, 15H06409]
  2. Adaptable and Seamless Technology Transfer Program (A-STEP) by the Japan Science and Technology (JST) Agency
  3. Murata Science Foundation
  4. Cooperative Research Project of the Research Institute of Electronics, Shizuoka University
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H06409] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Radio-photoluminescence (RPL) is a phenomenon seen in luminescent materials in which the appearance of new photoluminescence (PL) emission is induced by an incident ionizing radiation such as X-rays; and the signal is stable even after the irradiation and during the PL measurement. Since the induced PL intensity is proportional to the irradiation dose, the RPL can be used in radiation measurements. The distinct advantage of RPL over the conventional thermally- or photo-stimulated luminescence (abbreviated as TSL or PSL) dosimeters is the stability of response signal. With an RPL detector, it allows us to readout the signal multiple time without signal fading. In this work, we discovered that CsBr: Sm showed an RPL phenomenon by X-ray irradiation, and we characterized this new material as an RPL detector. While the sample showed PL emissions mainly in the visible range, after an X-ray irradiation additional emissions could be observed in the red to near-infrared range around 650-850 nm and 900-1000 nm and longer. The RPL response was fairly stable overall, but very interestingly the 650-850 nm signal slightly increased while the 900-1000 nm decreased during PL readout. The dynamic range was confirmed over 1-10(4) mGy with linear response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据