4.7 Article

In vitro to in vivo acetaminophen hepatotoxicity extrapolation using classical schemes, pharmacodynamic models and a multiscale spatial-temporal liver twin

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1049564

关键词

APAP; in vitro to in vivo extrapolation; acetaminophen; drug toxicity; digital twin; multi-scale; modeling; metabolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the author explores extrapolation strategies for acetaminophen (APAP) based on mechanistic models and compares different model types. The research shows that a classical homogeneous compartment model can accurately predict in vivo toxicity from in vitro data. However, a spatial-temporal multiscale model, which integrates more experimental information, requires adjustments to achieve the same prediction, suggesting the importance of spatial compartmentalization.
In vitro to in vivo extrapolation represents a critical challenge in toxicology. In this paper we explore extrapolation strategies for acetaminophen (APAP) based on mechanistic models, comparing classical (CL) homogeneous compartment pharmacodynamic (PD) models and a spatial-temporal (ST), multiscale digital twin model resolving liver microarchitecture at cellular resolution. The models integrate consensus detoxification reactions in each individual hepatocyte. We study the consequences of the two model types on the extrapolation and show in which cases these models perform better than the classical extrapolation strategy that is based either on the maximal drug concentration (Cmax) or the area under the pharmacokinetic curve (AUC) of the drug blood concentration. We find that an CL-model based on a well-mixed blood compartment is sufficient to correctly predict the in vivo toxicity from in vitro data. However, the ST-model that integrates more experimental information requires a change of at least one parameter to obtain the same prediction, indicating that spatial compartmentalization may indeed be an important factor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据