4.7 Article

Role of biochar in anaerobic microbiome enrichment and methane production enhancement during olive mill wastewater biomethanization

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1100533

关键词

biochar; direct interspecies electron transfer; anaerobic digestion; prokaryotic communities; olive mill wastewater

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact of biochar addition on anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewater with different initial chemical oxygen demand loads. It was found that adding biochar increased methane yield and mitigated volatile fatty acid accumulation. Additionally, biochar supplementation improved microbial community diversity and abundance of potential genera involved in direct interspecies electron transfer. These findings suggest that biochar could be a promising alternative for improving anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewater at a large scale.
The current research work attempted to investigate, for the first time, the impact of biochar addition, on anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewater with different initial chemical oxygen demand loads in batch cultures (10 g/L, 15 g/L, and 20 g/L). Methane yields were compared by applying one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc Tukey's analysis. The results demonstrated that adding at 5 g/L biochar to olive mill wastewater with an initial chemical oxygen demand load of 20 g/L increased methane yield by 97.8% and mitigated volatile fatty acid accumulation compared to the control batch. According to the results of microbial community succession revealed by the Illumina amplicon sequencing, biochar supplementation significantly increased diversity of the microbial community and improved the abundance of potential genera involved in direct interspecies electron transfer, including Methanothrix and Methanosarcina. Consequently, biochar can be a promising alternative in terms of the recovery of metabolic activity during anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewater at a large scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据