4.7 Review

Differentiation of pluripotent stem cells for modeling human skin development and potential applications

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1030339

关键词

human induced pluripotent stem cells; iPSCs; epidermal differentiation; 3D skin models; skin organoids; skin inherited diseases; keratinocyte

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JP15bm0104001]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP17K07165]
  3. LVMH Recherche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides an overview of strategies for differentiating human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) towards skin components, with a particular focus on keratinocytes. The use of patient-derived human induced PSCs (iPSCs) and skin organoid generation allows researchers to model inherited skin diseases and search for potential treatments.
The skin of mammals is a multilayered and multicellular tissue that forms an environmental barrier with key functions in protection, regulation, and sensation. While animal models have long served to study the basic functions of the skin in vivo, new insights are expected from in vitro models of human skin development. Human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) have proven to be invaluable tools for studying human development in vitro. To understand the mechanisms regulating human skin homeostasis and injury repair at the molecular level, recent efforts aim to differentiate PSCs towards skin epidermal keratinocytes, dermal fibroblasts, and skin appendages such as hair follicles and sebaceous glands. Here, we present an overview of the literature describing strategies for human PSC differentiation towards the components of skin, with a particular focus on keratinocytes. We highlight fundamental advances in the field employing patient-derived human induced PSCs (iPSCs) and skin organoid generation. Importantly, PSCs allow researchers to model inherited skin diseases in the search for potential treatments. Skin differentiation from human PSCs holds the potential to clarify human skin biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据