4.7 Article

A high-sensitivity high-resolution intravascular photoacoustic catheter through mode cleaning in a graded-index fiber

期刊

PHOTOACOUSTICS
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100451

关键词

Photoacoustic imaging; Intravascular; Lipid plaque; Atherosclerosis; Graded -index fiber; Self-cleaning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work reports an intravascular photoacoustic catheter with mode self-cleaning in a graded-index fiber, which improves the sensitivity and spatial resolution for plaque detection. The lower-order modes generated by the self-cleaning effect in the graded-index fiber greatly enhance the photoacoustic spatial resolution and detection sensitivity compared to the higher-order modes in a step-index multimode fiber. The dominant ringing artifact caused by laser absorption of the ultrasound transducer is further reduced by using stripe suppression. A lipid plaque mimicking phantom was imaged for evaluation, and lipid particles with a small diameter of 75.7 μm were clearly observed.
Intravascular photoacoustic imaging has been developed to evaluate the possibility of plaque rupture in atherosclerosis by high spatial resolution imaging of lipid. However, the detection sensitivity and spatial reso-lution are compromised by the poor focusing caused by a multimode fiber. In this work, we report an intra-vascular photoacoustic catheter with mode self-cleaning in a graded-index fiber to improve the beam quality and the sensitivity for lipid detection. Compared with the higher-order modes in a step-index multimode fiber, the lower-order modes generated by the self-cleaning effect in the graded-index fiber greatly enhanced the photo-acoustic spatial resolution and detection sensitivity. The dominant ringing artifact caused by laser absorption of the ultrasound transducer was further reduced by using stripe suppression. A lipid plaque mimicking phantom was imaged for evaluation. Lipid particles with a small diameter of 75.7 mu m were clearly observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据