相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Lessons learnt from registration of biomedical research
Stylianos Serghiou et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2023)
Pre-Analysis Plans: An Early Stocktaking
George K. Ofosu et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS (2023)
Outlier Exclusion Procedures Must Be Blind to the Researcher's Hypothesis
Quentin Andre
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2022)
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
Brian A. Nosek et al.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY (2022)
Protecting against researcher bias in secondary data analysis: challenges and potential solutions
Jessie R. Baldwin et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2022)
The past, present and future of Registered Reports
Christopher D. Chambers et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2022)
Understanding the Exploratory/Confirmatory Data Analysis Continuum: Moving Beyond the Replication Crisis
Dustin A. Fife et al.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2022)
A Template for Preregistration of Quantitative Research in Psychology: Report of the Joint Psychological Societies Preregistration Task Force
Michael Bosnjak et al.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2022)
A survey on how preregistration affects the research workflow: better science but more work
Alexandra Sarafoglou et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2022)
Discrepancy review: a feasibility study of a novel peer review intervention to reduce undisclosed discrepancies between registrations and publications
Robert T. Thibault et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2022)
Estimating the Prevalence of Transparency and Reproducibility-Related Research Practices in Psychology (2014-2017)
Tom E. Hardwicke et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2022)
Multiple comparisons: a tutorial. Part 1. Understanding hypothesis testing
Michael T. Lawson et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2021)
Flexible yet fair: blinding analyses in experimental psychology
Gilles Dutilh et al.
SYNTHESE (2021)
Analysis goals, error-cost sensitivity, and analysis hacking: Essential considerations in hypothesis testing and multiple comparisons
Sander Greenland
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)
Preregistration in diverse contexts: a preregistration template for the application of cognitive models
Sophia Cruwell et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2021)
Comparing dream to reality: an assessment of adherence of the first generation of preregistered studies
Aline Claesen et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2021)
Aspiring to greater intellectual humility in science
Rink Hoekstra et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2021)
The case for formal methodology in scientific reform
Berna Devezer et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2021)
Making ERP research more transparent: Guidelines for preregistration
Mariella Paul et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY (2021)
Opening the Door to Registered Reports: Census of Journals Publishing Registered Reports (2013-2020)
Amanda Kay Montoya et al.
COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY (2021)
Examining the robustness of observational associations to model, measurement and sampling uncertainty with the vibration of effects framework
Simon Klau et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)
An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports
Anne M. Scheel et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2021)
Pre-registration: Why and How
P. Joseph Simmons et al.
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY (2021)
Arrested Theory Development: The Misguided Distinction Between Exploratory and Confirmatory Research
Aba Szollosi et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2021)
Why Hypothesis Testers Should Spend Less Time Testing Hypotheses
Anne M. Scheel et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2021)
Study Preregistration: An Evaluation of a Method for Transparent Reporting
Allison A. Toth et al.
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY (2021)
A Traveler's Guide to the Multiverse: Promises, Pitfalls, and a Framework for the Evaluation of Analytic Decisions
Marco Del Giudice et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2021)
Compliance with legal requirement to report clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov: a cohort study
Nicholas J. DeVito et al.
LANCET (2020)
Is Preregistration Worthwhile?
Aba Szollosi et al.
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (2020)
An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014-2017)
Tom E. Hardwicke et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2020)
Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams
Rotem Botvinik-Nezer et al.
NATURE (2020)
Specification curve analysis
Uri Simonsohn et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2020)
Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy
Hans IJzerman et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2020)
Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations
Marjan Bakker et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2020)
Preregistering Qualitative Research: A Delphi Study
Tamarinde L. Haven et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS (2020)
Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings?
Mark Rubin
QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR PSYCHOLOGY (2020)
COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time
Ben Goldacre et al.
TRIALS (2019)
Prevalence of trial registration varies by study characteristics and risk of bias
Aidan Christopher Tan et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond
Christopher Allen et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2019)
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Jonathan A. C. Sterne et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)
Result dissemination from clinical trials conducted at German university medical centers was delayed and incomplete
Susanne Wieschowski et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile
Brian A. Nosek et al.
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (2019)
Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research
Tom E. Hardwicke et al.
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application (2019)
Registered reports: an early example an analysis
Richard Wiseman et al.
PEERJ (2019)
Preregistering qualitative research
Tamarinde L. Haven et al.
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY (2019)
Multiple Perspectives on Inference for Two Simple Statistical Scenarios
Noah N. N. van Dongen et al.
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)
A problem in theory
Michael Muthukrishna et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2019)
The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use
Amy Orben et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2019)
Addressing the theory crisis in psychology
Klaus Oberauer et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2019)
Correcting for Bias in Psychology: A Comparison of Meta-Analytic Methods
Evan C. Carter et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2019)
Pre-specification of statistical analysis approaches in published clinical trial protocols was inadequate
Lauren Greenberg et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)
Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics
Spyridon N. Papageorgiou et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)
Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution
Hannah Fraser et al.
PLOS ONE (2018)
The preregistration revolution
Brian A. Nosek et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review
Matthew J. Page et al.
BMJ OPEN (2018)
Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A US Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians
Min Qi Wang et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2018)
Registration, results reporting, and publication bias of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of neuropsychiatric drugs before and after FDAAA: a retrospective cohort study
Constance X. Zou et al.
TRIALS (2018)
Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015-2017
Oshua D. Wallach et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2018)
Mapping the universe of registered reports
Tom E. Hardwicke et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2018)
Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research
Garret Christensen et al.
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE (2018)
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015
Colin F. Camerer et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2018)
Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results
R. Silberzahn et al.
ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
The Creativity-Verification Cycle in Psychological Science: New Methods to Combat Old Idols
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Replication, Registration, and Scientific Creativity
C. J. Brainerd et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)
Imputation in US Manufacturing Data and Its Implications for Productivity Dispersion
T. Kirk White et al.
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS (2018)
Journal Article Reporting Standards for Quantitative Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report
Mark Appelbaum et al.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2018)
Who Believes in the Storybook Image of the Scientist?
Coosje L. S. Veldkamp et al.
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE (2017)
Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings - a practical guide
Wolfgang Forstmeier et al.
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS (2017)
Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established
Deborah A. Zarin et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2017)
Association of the FDA Amendment Act with trial registration, publication, and outcome reporting
Adam T. Phillips et al.
TRIALS (2017)
Association between trial registration and positive study findings: cross sectional study (Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials-ESORT)
Ayodele Odutayo et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
Denes Szucs et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2017)
Association between trial registration and positive study findings: cross sectional study (Epidemiological Study of Randomized Trials-ESORT)
Ayodele Odutayo et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress
Mark Rubin
REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY (2017)
Evaluation of Evidence of Statistical Support and Corroboration of Subgroup Claims in Randomized Clinical Trials
Joshua D. Wallach et al.
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2017)
Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015
David Chavalarias et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2016)
Registration practices for observational studies on ClinicalTrials.gov indicated low adherence
Stefania Boccia et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
Compliance with prospective trial registration guidance remained low in high-impact journals and has implications for primary end point reporting
Rafael Dal-Re et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
How Bayes factors change scientific practice
Zoltan Dienes
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
IS THERE A REPRODUCIBILITY CRISIS?
Monya Baker
NATURE (2016)
Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
Colin F. Camerer et al.
SCIENCE (2016)
Publication bias and the canonization of false facts
Silas Boye Nissen et al.
ELIFE (2016)
The natural selection of bad science
Paul E. Smaldino et al.
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2016)
Underreporting in Psychology Experiments: Evidence From a Study Registry
Annie Franco et al.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE (2016)
Rethinking the assessment of risk of bias due to selective reporting: a cross-sectional study
Matthew J. Page et al.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2016)
Hidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies
Angelique O. J. Cramer et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2016)
Standard Operating Procedures: A Safety Net for Pre-Analysis Plans
Winston Lin et al.
PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS (2016)
Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis
Sara Steegen et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2016)
Assessment of vibration of effects due to model specification can demonstrate the instability of observational associations
Chirag J. Patel et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
Hide results to seek the truth
Robert MacCoun et al.
NATURE (2015)
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Alexander A. Aarts et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
Promoting an open research culture
B. A. Nosek et al.
SCIENCE (2015)
Trial registration 10 years on
Wim E. J. Weber et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
Trial registration 10 years on
Wim E. J. Weber et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2015)
HANDLING THE FRAGILE VASE OF SCIENTIFIC PRACTICES
John P. A. Ioannidis
ADDICTION (2015)
Likelihood of Null Effects of Large NHLBI Clinical Trials Has Increased over Time
Robert M. Kaplan et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
A Short (Personal) Future History of Revolution 2.0
Barbara A. Spellman
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2015)
Opportunistic Biases Their Origins, Effects, and an Integrated Solution
Jamie DeCoster et al.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2015)
Promises and Perils of Pre-Analysis Plans
Benjamin A. Olken
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES (2015)
Pre-Analysis Plans Have Limited Upside, Especially Where Replications Are Feasible
Lucas C. Coffman et al.
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES (2015)
Research Preregistration in Political Science: The Case, Counterarguments, and a Response to Critiques
James E. Monogan
PS-POLITICAL SCIENCE & POLITICS (2015)
The Statistical Crisis in Science
Andrew Gelman et al.
AMERICAN SCIENTIST (2014)
Reporting Discrepancies Between the ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database and Peer-Reviewed Publications
Daniel M. Hartung et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2014)
Reporting of Results in ClinicalTrials.gov and High-Impact Journals
Jessica E. Becker et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2014)
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
Paul Glasziou et al.
LANCET (2014)
Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer
Annie Franco et al.
SCIENCE (2014)
Making Prospective Registration of Observational Research a Reality
Rafael Dal-Re et al.
SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE (2014)
Prediction and accommodation revisited
John Worrall
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2014)
Distinguishing between Exploratory and Confirmatory Preclinical Research Will Improve Translation
Jonathan Kimmelman et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2014)
Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials
Kerry Dwan et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2014)
The meaning of significance for different types of research [translated and annotated by Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Denny Borsboom, Josine Verhagen, Rogier Kievit, Marjan Bakker, Angelique Cramer, Dora Matzke, Don Mellenbergh, and Han L. J. van der Maas]
A. D. de Groot
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA (2014)
A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how
Lehana Thabane et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2013)
被撤回的出版物: World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (Retracted article. See vol. 135, pg. 2149, 2021)
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2013)
Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Katherine S. Button et al.
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE (2013)
Use of Trial Register Information during the Peer Review Process
Sylvain Mathieu et al.
PLOS ONE (2013)
State of the Field: Why novel prediction matters
Heather Douglas et al.
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2013)
Fishing, Commitment, and Communication: A Proposal for Comprehensive Nonbinding Research Registration
Macartan Humphreys et al.
POLITICAL ANALYSIS (2013)
Forgetting What We Learned as Graduate Students: HARKing and Selective Outcome Reporting in I-O Journal Articles
Joseph J. Mazzola et al.
INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE (2013)
The Evolution of Trial Registries and Their Use to Assess the Clinical Trial Enterprise
Kay Dickersin et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2012)
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
Daniele Fanelli
SCIENTOMETRICS (2012)
Reshaping Institutions: Evidence on Aid Impacts Using a Preanalysis Plan
Katherine Casey et al.
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS (2012)
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability
Brian A. Nosek et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science
Marjan Bakker et al.
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science
Roger Giner-Sorolla
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
On the Use of Holdout Samples for Model Selection
Frank Schorfheide et al.
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW (2012)
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
Leslie K. John et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2012)
Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?
Zoltan Dienes
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2011)
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
Joseph P. Simmons et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2011)
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
Jonathan A. C. Sterne et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)
BAYES AND EMPIRICAL-BAYES MULTIPLICITY ADJUSTMENT IN THE VARIABLE-SELECTION PROBLEM
James G. Scott et al.
ANNALS OF STATISTICS (2010)
Preregistration of Study Protocols Is Unlikely to Improve the Yield From Our Science, But Other Strategies Might
Timothy L. Lash
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research
I. Simera et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION (2010)
Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: an argument for multiple comparisons correction
CM Bennett et al.
NEUROIMAGE (2009)
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
Daniele Fanelli
PLOS ONE (2009)
Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy
Erick H. Turner et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2008)
Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
Neal S. Young et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2008)
Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols
An-Wen Chan et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2008)
Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment
Emily Pronin
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (2007)
Testing multiple statistical hypotheses resulted in spurious associations: A study of astrological signs and health
Peter C. Austin et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis
PR Williamson et al.
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH (2005)
Why most published research findings are false
JPA Ioannidis
PLOS MEDICINE (2005)
Testing hypotheses: Prediction and prejudice
P Lipton
SCIENCE (2005)
Prediction versus accommodation and the risk of overfitting
C Hitchcock et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE (2004)
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials -: Comparison of Protocols to published articles
AW Chan et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2004)
Investigation of within-study selective reporting in clinical research: follow-up of applications submitted to a local research ethics committee
S Hahn et al.
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE (2002)