4.5 Article

Weighting factor elicitation for sustainability assessment of energy technologies

期刊

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 832-847

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2se01170k

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the authors propose an approach for assessing the sustainability of innovative energy technologies using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods. They conducted a workshop to determine the weighting factors for sustainability assessments based on stakeholders' preferences. The results were applied to an integrative sustainability assessment using the Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE). The case study on hydrogen-based mobility showed that a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) with hydrogen supply through pipelines performed the best in terms of sustainability.
In this paper, an approach for sustainability assessment of innovative energy technologies is expanded by multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods to aggregate indicator results and support decision-making. One of the most important steps for MCDA is to determine weighting factors for individual indicators. Thus, a workshop was performed to elicit weighting factors for sustainability assessments of energy technologies from developers of such technologies and energy system modellers from academia. These stakeholders expressed their preferences with respect to sustainability criteria using the Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART). A triple bottom line approach of sustainable development was used as the basis for the aggregation of indicator results. This approach is based on Life Cycle Costing, Life Cycle Assessment and social indicators. Obtained weighting factors were applied to an integrative sustainability assessment with the aggregation method Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE). Hydrogen-based mobility as an important technology to foster decarbonization in the transport sector is used as a case study for the application of the derived weighting factors. A conventional vehicle, powered by fossil fuel, is compared with a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) for the year 2050. Different options (pipeline, compressed gaseous hydrogen, liquid hydrogen, liquid organic hydrogen carrier) are discussed for the supply of hydrogen. The results for this weighting factor set are compared with an equal weighting scenario of the three sustainability dimensions and indicators within one sustainability dimension. The FCEV, using pipelines for hydrogen supply, came out first in the assessment as well as in all sensitivity analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据