4.3 Article

Polarons and electrical leakage in BaZrO3 and BaCeO3

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.015402

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, first-principles calculations based on density functional theory were used to investigate the properties of hole and electron polarons in barium zirconate (BZO) and barium cerate (BCO). It was found that hole polarons form in both materials, more favorably in BCO. Electron polarons, on the other hand, are stable only in BCO and Ce-containing alloys. Doping BZO and BCO can lead to negligible electron concentrations and larger concentrations of holes and hole polarons.
The proton conductors barium zirconate (BaZrO3, or BZO), barium cerate (BaCeO3, or BCO), and their alloys have attracted considerable interest as solid-state electrolytes in solid-oxide fuel and electrolysis cells. However, the reasons for their non-negligible electrical conductivity, which can limit their performance, are not fully understood. To address that question, we use first-principles calculations based on density functional theory to study the properties of hole and electron polarons in BZO and BCO. We confirm that hole polarons form in both materials, slightly more favorably in BCO. Electron polarons, on the other hand, are stable only in BCO and in Ce-containing alloys; in pure BZO, electron polaron states are unfavorable relative to free carriers, though they become accessible when Ce impurities are introduced. In general, doped BZO and BCO will have negligible electron concentrations, but larger concentrations of holes and hole polarons may be present. Avoiding extreme O-rich conditions and limiting dopant concentrations are key strategies for reducing significant p-type electrical leakage. Our results provide physical insights into the different electronic behaviors of BZO and BCO, which can be used to optimize their performance as pure ionic conductors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据