4.5 Article

Carbohydrate complexity limits microbial growth and reduces the sensitivity of human gut communities to perturbations

期刊

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01930-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dietary fibre has a significant impact on the growth of human gut microbiota. This study explored the effects of fibres with different chemical complexities and their constituent sugars on microbial interaction networks and responses to perturbations. The results showed that the chemical complexity of fibres limits microbial growth and species diversity. Fibres reduce negative interspecies interactions compared to their constituent sugars. Carbohydrate chemical complexity enhances community assembly reproducibility and resistance to invasion.
Dietary fibre impacts the growth dynamics of human gut microbiota, yet we lack a detailed and quantitative understanding of how these nutrients shape microbial interaction networks and responses to perturbations. By building human gut communities coupled with computational modelling, we dissect the effects of fibres that vary in chemical complexity and each of their constituent sugars on community assembly and response to perturbations. We demonstrate that the degree of chemical complexity across different fibres limits microbial growth and the number of species that can utilize these nutrients. The prevalence of negative interspecies interactions is reduced in the presence of fibres compared with their constituent sugars. Carbohydrate chemical complexity enhances the reproducibility of community assembly and resistance of the community to invasion. We demonstrate that maximizing or minimizing carbohydrate competition between resident and invader species enhances resistance to invasion. In sum, the quantitative effects of carbohydrate chemical complexity on microbial interaction networks could be exploited to inform dietary and bacterial interventions to modulate community resistance to perturbations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据