4.4 Article

A fast-rising tidal disruption event from a candidate intermediate-mass black hole

期刊

NATURE ASTRONOMY
卷 6, 期 12, 页码 1452-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-022-01811-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. VILLUM FONDEN Investigator grant [16599]
  2. VILLUM FONDEN Young Investigator Grant [25501]
  3. AAUW Dissertation Fellowship [80NSSC21K1409]
  4. NASA [80NSSC20K0953, NAS 5-26555, NNX08AR22G]
  5. NSF [AST-1815935, AST-1911206, AST-1852393, AST-1440341, AST-1238877]
  6. Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation
  7. Heising-Simons Foundation
  8. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  9. Nasa Swift
  10. NICER
  11. European Union [891744]
  12. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D) [CE170100013]
  13. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery (OzGrav) [CE170100004]
  14. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF132]
  15. Hong Kong government [HKU27305119, HKU17304821]
  16. NSERC [RGPIN-2019-06186]
  17. Canada Research Chairs Program
  18. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)
  19. Dunlap Institute at the University of Toronto
  20. NASA through the NASA Hubble Fellowship - Space Telescope Science Institute [HF2-51462.001]
  21. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program [1842400, DGE-1746047]
  22. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE1339067]
  23. Center for Astrophysical Surveys Fellowship at UIUC/NCSA
  24. Illinois Distinguished Fellowship
  25. W. M. Keck Foundation
  26. international Gemini Observatory [GN-2020A-DD-111]
  27. Caltech
  28. IPAC
  29. Weizmann Institute for Science
  30. Oskar Klein Center at Stockholm University
  31. University of Maryland
  32. University of Washington
  33. Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron
  34. Humboldt University
  35. Los Alamos National Laboratories
  36. TANGO Consortium of Taiwan
  37. University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee
  38. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  39. [P61-022]
  40. [SNAP-16239]
  41. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [891744] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Massive black holes are commonly found in the centers of massive galaxies, but their presence in dwarf galaxies is not yet known. AT 2020neh is a fast-rising tidal disruption event candidate hosted by a dwarf galaxy, which provides a potential method of measuring the masses of intermediate-mass black holes. The observable rate of such events is found to be low, which highlights the importance of finding non-accreting black holes in dwarf galaxies and understanding their prevalence within these galaxies.
Massive black holes (BHs) at the centres of massive galaxies are ubiquitous. The population of BHs within dwarf galaxies, on the other hand, is not yet known. Dwarf galaxies are thought to harbour BHs with proportionally small masses, including intermediate-mass BHs, with masses 10(2) < M-BH < 10(6) solar masses (M-circle dot). Identification of these systems has historically relied on the detection of light emitted from accreting gaseous disks close to the BHs. Without this light, they are difficult to detect. Tidal disruption events, the luminous flares produced when a star strays close to a BH and is shredded, are a direct way to probe massive BHs. The rise times of these flares theoretically correlate with the BH mass. Here we present AT 2020neh, a fast-rising tidal disruption event candidate, hosted by a dwarf galaxy. AT 2020neh can be described by the tidal disruption of a main sequence star by a 10(4.7)-10(5.9) M-circle dot BH. We find the observable rate of fast-rising nuclear transients like AT 2020neh to be low, at less than or similar to 2 x 10(-8) events Mpc(-3) yr(-1). Finding non-accreting BHs in dwarf galaxies is important to determine how prevalent BHs are within these galaxies, and to constrain models of BH formation. AT 2020neh-like events may provide a galaxy-independent method of measuring the masses of intermediate-mass BHs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据