4.7 Article

Resistance Mechanisms of Sitobion miscanthi (Hemiptera: Aphididae) to Malathion Revealed by Synergist Assay

期刊

INSECTS
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/insects13111043

关键词

S; miscanthi; malathion resistance; synergists; detoxification enzymes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The resistance of Sitobion miscanthi to malathion is characterized by low heritability and no cross-resistance to imidacloprid. The increase in esterase activity may play an important role in the resistance of S. miscanthi to malathion.
Simple Summary The resistance of Sitobion miscanthi to malathion possessed low realized heritability. No cross-resistance was found to imidacloprid in the resistant strain. The increase in esterase was involved in S. miscanthi resistance to malathion by the assay of inhibitor synergism and esterase activity. A resistant strain (MRS) of Sitobion miscanthi was cultured by continuous selection with malathion for over 40 generations. The MRS exhibited 32.7-fold resistance to malathion compared to the susceptible strain (MSS) and 13.5-fold, 2.9-fold and 4.8-fold cross-resistance for omethoate, methomyl and beta-cypermethrin, respectively. However, no cross-resistance was found to imidacloprid in this resistant strain. The realized heritability for malathion resistance was 0.02. Inhibitors of esterase activity, both triphenyl phosphate (TPP) and S,S,S,-tributyl phosphorotrithioate (DEF) as synergists, exhibited significant synergism to malathion in the MRS strain, with 11.77-fold and 5.12-fold synergistic ratios, respectively, while piperonyl butoxide (PBO) and diethyl maleate (DEM) showed no significant synergism in the MRS strain. The biochemical assay indicated that carboxylesterase activity was higher in MRS than in MSS. These results suggest that the increase in esterase activity might play an important role in S. miscanthi resistance to malathion. Imidacloprid could be used as an alternative for malathion in the management of wheat aphid resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据