4.6 Article

Improvement Breakdown Voltage by a Using Crown-Shaped Gate

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics12030474

关键词

IGBT; breakdown voltage; crown-shaped gate; sidewall spacer; trench gate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a crown-shaped trench gate formed by a sidewall spacer is proposed to improve the breakdown voltage of insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBT). The electric field is distributed to the sidewall spacer surface, reducing the peak electric field to 48% and improving the breakdown voltage to 5%. Another study suggests adding an oxide layer to trench bottom corners, which also improves the breakdown voltage. However, previous studies have shown degradation in other electrical characteristics. This study demonstrates a sidewall spacer IGBT that increases current by over 3% compared to conventional trench IGBTs and maintains similar turn-off loss characteristics, improving the breakdown voltage while maintaining existing electrical properties.
In this paper, a crown-shaped trench gate formed by a sidewall spacer in insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBT) is proposed to improve breakdown voltage. When a sidewall spacer is added to trench bottom corners, the electric field is distributed to the surface of the sidewall spacer and decreased to 48% peak value of the electric field. Thus, the sidewall spacer IGBT improved to 5% breakdown voltage. Another study proposed an additional oxide layer for trench bottom corners and improved breakdown voltage similar to the proposed IGBT. Previous studies have shown degradation in other electrical characteristics. However, this study shows a sidewall spacer IGBT that increases the current over 3% compared to a conventional trench IGBT when the applied gate voltage is under 4 V. Additionally, the turn-off loss characteristic is similar to conventional trench IGBT. Therefore, the breakdown voltage of the IGBT was improved while maintaining similar electrical properties to existing IGBTs through the crown-shaped gate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据