4.6 Article

Flatness-Based Backstepping Antisway Control of Underactuated Crane Systems under Wind Disturbance

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics12010244

关键词

differential flatness; underactuated systems; backstepping; trajectory planning; antisway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A control method combining trajectory planning and backstepping is proposed for solving the antisway problem of underactuated overhead cranes under wind disturbance. The method includes proposing flat outputs to represent the crane system dynamics, providing relevant constraints for the trolley's desired position and swing angle suppression, obtaining planned trajectory through optimal parameters of the flat output, and designing a tracking controller to reduce deviation caused by wind disturbance. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method.
A control method that combines trajectory planning and backstepping is proposed for the antisway problem of underactuated overhead cranes under wind disturbance. First, a set of flat outputs is proposed so that the crane system dynamics can be represented by each order of flat outputs. Sufficient relevant constraints are given to ensure that the trolley can arrive at the desired position in a limited time under variable rope lengths, and that the swing angle can be suppressed when the payload is lifted or lowered during operation. The planned trajectory is obtained by solving for the optimal parameters of the flat output. Next, to reduce the deviation caused by wind disturbance on the actual control of the trajectory, a tracking controller is designed. Because the system output space and flat output space are differentiable homeomorphisms, the backstepping controller constructed based on the flat output can indirectly control the system output, which makes the backstepping method applicable to underactuated cranes. The simulation results show that the proposed method is effective and has strong robustness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据