4.6 Article

Designing a Spintronic Based Magnetoresistive Bridge Sensor for Current Measurement and Low Field Sensing

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 11, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11233888

关键词

magnetoresistive sensors; anisotropic magnetoresistance; current sensors; planar Hall effect; exchange bias; magnetic field modeling; micromagnetic simulations

资金

  1. Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CCCDI-UEFISCDI [PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019-3514, 510PED/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A exchanged-biased anisotropic magnetoresistance bridge sensor for low currents measurement is designed and implemented using analytical and simulation methods. The sensor has high sensitivity and can be used in various sensor configurations.
An exchanged-biased anisotropic magnetoresistance bridge sensor for low currents measurement is designed and implemented. The sensor has a simple construction (single mask) and is based on results from micromagnetic simulations. For increasing the sensitivity of the sensor, the magnetic field generated by the measurement current passing through the printed circuit board trace is determined through an analytical method and, for comparative analysis, finite elements method simulations are used. The sensor performance is experimentally tested with a demonstrator chip. Four case studies are considered in the analytical method: neglecting the thickness of the trace, dividing the thickness of the trace in several layers, and assuming a finite or very long conductive trace. Additionally, the influence of several adjacent traces in the sensor area is evaluated. The study shows that the analytical design method can be used for optimizing the geometric selectivity of a non-contacting magnetoresistive bridge sensor setup in single trace, differential, and multi-trace (planar coil) configurations. Further, the results can be applied for developing highly performant magnetoresistance sensors and optimizations for low field detection, small dimensions, and low costs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据