4.5 Article

Line strengths of rovibrational and rotational transitions in the X-2 Pi ground state of OH

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.07.021

关键词

OH hydroxyl radical; Line intensities; Einstein A values; Dipole moment function; Meinel system; Line lists

资金

  1. Department of Chemistry (University of York)
  2. NASA Origins of Solar Systems program
  3. Turkish Scientific and Technological Research Council (TUBITAK) [1121929]
  4. Research Project Grant from the Leverhulme Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new line list including positions and absolute transition strengths (in the form of Einstein A values and oscillator strengths) has been produced for the OH ground X-2 Pi state rovibrational (Meinel system) and pure rotational transitions. All possible transitions are included with v' and v '' up to 13, and J up to between 9.5 and 59.5, depending on the band. An updated fit to determine molecular constants has been performed, which includes some new rotational data and a simultaneous fitting of all molecular constants. The absolute transition strengths are based on a new dipole moment function, which is a combination of two high level ab initio calculations. The calculations show good agreement with an experimental v = 1 lifetime, experimental mu(v) values, and Delta v =2 line intensity ratios from an observed spectrum. To achieve this good agreement, an alteration in the method of converting matrix elements from Hund's case (b) to (a) was made. Partitions sums have been calculated using the new energy levels, for the temperature range 5-6000 K, which extends the previously available (in HITRAN) 70-3000 K range. The resulting absolute transition strengths have been used to calculate 0 abundances in the Sun, Arcturus, and two red giants in the Galactic open and globular clusters M67 and M71. Literature data based mainly on [O I] lines are available for the Sun and Arcturus, and excellent agreement is found. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据