4.7 Article

Preparation and application of edible agar-based composite films modified by cellulose nanocrystals

期刊

FOOD PACKAGING AND SHELF LIFE
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100936

关键词

Agar; Edible agar-based composite films; Cellulose nanocrystals; Comprehensive film properties; Strawberry preservation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigated the properties of various agar/gelatin composite films modified by cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), as well as agar/gellan gum and agar/kappa-carrageenan composite films modified by CNC and calcium chloride. The results showed that these composite films had dense and smooth surface structures, with high tensile strength, elongation at break, and light transmittance, along with low water swelling rate, water solubility, and water vapor permeability. These films not only exhibited better comprehensive properties than existing studies, but also showed good performance in preserving strawberries.
In this paper, agar/gelatin (AG/GE) composite film modified by cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), agar/gellan gum (AG/GG) and agar/kappa-carrageenan (AG/KC) composite films modified by CNC and calcium chloride were pre-pared and their properties were investigated. The results showed that the three prepared nanocomposite films exhibited dense and smooth surface structure, and their tensile strength (TS), elongation at break (EB) and light transmittance were larger than 60 MPa, 21 %, 80 % at 660 nm, respectively. Their water swelling rate (SR), water solubility (WS) and water vapor permeability (WVP) were lower than 155 %, 33 % and 6.8 x 10(-11)g m/m(2) Pa s, respectively. These three prepared films not only exhibited better comprehensive properties than those of the existing studies, but also possessed edible, good light transmittance and heat seal performance, especially, possessed better fresh keeping performance than plastic-based food packaging film when they were used to preserve strawberry through packaging or coating methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据