4.7 Article

A fast-response visual indicator film based on polyvinyl alcohol/ methylcellulose/black wolfberry anthocyanin for monitoring chicken and shrimp freshness

期刊

FOOD PACKAGING AND SHELF LIFE
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100939

关键词

Biodegradable material; Black wolfberry anthocyanin; Visual indicator film; Color response; Freshness monitoring

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871866]
  2. Innovation of Agricultural Science and Technology of Jiangsu Province [CX (22) 2044]
  3. China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA [CARS-41]
  4. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Plan Project [CX (22) 2044]
  5. Jiangsu Procambarus Clarkia Industry Technique System [31871866]
  6. [JFRS-03]
  7. [2021GG0347]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A smart visual indicator film was developed by introducing black wolfberry anthocyanins to a solid matrix, enhancing hydrogen-bond interactions among the polymers and improving material stability and elongation.
Natural anthocyanins are considered favorable indicators for new sensing materials because of their wide pH color range. Here, a smart visual indicator film was developed by introducing black wolfberry (BW) anthocyanins to a solid matrix composed of polyvinyl alcohol (PVOH) and methylcellulose (MC). Fourier transform infrared and X-ray showed that the introduction of BW anthocyanins enhanced hydrogen-bond interactions among the polymers and the anthocyanins were well fixed in the polymer matrix. 5 % BW could improve the stability of the PVOH/MC/BW and increase its tensile strength and breakage elongation by 63.2 % and 53.0 %, respectively. Optical observations and freshness monitoring suggested that the film loaded with 5 % BW could respond to acidic and basic vapors within 10 s and as low as 25 ppm NH3 in chicken and shrimp during storage at 4 degrees C. Therefore, PVOH/MC/BW-5% may potentially be used as a smart sensor to determine freshness in practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据