4.5 Review

Impact of non- native tree species in Europe on soil properties and biodiversity: a review

期刊

NEOBIOTA
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 45-69

出版社

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.78.87022

关键词

biodiversity; biogeography; forest management; pairwise stand comparisons; soil impacts

资金

  1. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [FP1403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the context of global change, the integration of non-native tree species in European forestry is a topic of increasing discussion. However, the ecological consequences of using or spreading non-native tree species in European forests are still uncertain. This study compiles data on the impacts of seven important non-native tree species on soil properties and diversity attributes in Europe, and summarizes their commonalities and differences. The results suggest that forest managers should be cautious in using non-native tree species, as they often have negative impacts on biodiversity and soil properties.
In the context of global change, the integration of non-native tree (NNT) species into European forestry is increasingly being discussed. The ecological consequences of increasing use or spread of NNTs in European forests are highly uncertain, as the scientific evidence is either constraint to results from case studies with limited spatial extent, or concerns global assessments that lack focus on European NNTs. For either case, generalisations on European NNTs are challenging to draw. Here we compile data on the impacts of seven important NNTs (Acacia dealbata, Ailanthus altissima, Eucalyptus globulus, Prunus serotina, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Quercus rubra, Robinia pseudoacacia) on physical and chemical soil properties and diversity attributes in Europe, and summarise commonalities and differences. From a total of 103 publications considered, studies on diversity attributes were overall more frequent than studies on soil properties. The effects on soil properties varied greatly among tree species and depended on the respective soil property. Overall, increasing (45%) and decreasing (45%) impacts on soil occurred with similar frequency. In contrast, decreasing impacts on biodiversity were much more frequent (66%) than increasing ones (24%). Species phylogenetically distant from European tree species, such as Acacia dealbata, Eucalyptus globulus and Ailanthus altissima, showed the strongest decreasing impacts on biodiversity. Our results suggest that forest managers should be cautious in using NNTs, as a majority of NNT stands host fewer species when compared with native tree species or ecosystems, likely reflected in changes in biotic interactions and ecosystem functions. The high variability of impacts suggests that individual NNTs should be assessed separately, but NNTs that lack European relatives should be used with particular caution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据