4.7 Review

Isolation, Detection and Analysis of Circulating Tumour Cells: A Nanotechnological Bioscope

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010280

关键词

circulating tumour cells; metastasis; nanotechnology; nanomaterials; isolation; detection; cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer is a devastating disease and early diagnosis remains a challenge. Recently, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been extensively studied for their potential in detecting metastasis. Nanomaterial-based strategies have emerged as promising tools for early and rapid examination of tumor cells. This review provides a comprehensive overview of different nanotechnological methodologies and their application in cancer research, including the detection, isolation, and analysis of CTCs. State-of-the-art implementations, future challenges, and recommendations are also discussed.
Cancer is one of the dreaded diseases to which a sizeable proportion of the population succumbs every year. Despite the tremendous growth of the health sector, spanning diagnostics to treatment, early diagnosis is still in its infancy. In this regard, circulating tumour cells (CTCs) have of late grabbed the attention of researchers in the detection of metastasis and there has been a huge surge in the surrounding research activities. Acting as a biomarker, CTCs prove beneficial in a variety of aspects. Nanomaterial-based strategies have been devised to have a tremendous impact on the early and rapid examination of tumor cells. This review provides a panoramic overview of the different nanotechnological methodologies employed along with the pharmaceutical purview of cancer. Initiating from fundamentals, the recent nanotechnological developments toward the detection, isolation, and analysis of CTCs are comprehensively delineated. The review also includes state-of-the-art implementations of nanotechnological advances in the enumeration of CTCs, along with future challenges and recommendations thereof.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据