4.7 Article

Studies on the Interaction between Model Proteins and Fluorinated Ionic Liquids

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010157

关键词

fluorinated ionic liquids; surface-active ionic liquids; encapsulation; protein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteins can be stabilized and have improved properties in the presence of ionic liquids (ILs) as cosolvents or surfactants. By using techniques such as small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), fluorescence microscopy, and coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CG-MD) simulations, the interaction between ILs and proteins like lysozyme and bovine serum albumin has been studied. The results show that ILs help maintain the globular structures of proteins and can be used for formulating protein-based pharmaceuticals.
Proteins are inherently unstable, which limits their use as therapeutic agents. However, the use of biocompatible cosolvents or surfactants can help to circumvent this problem through the stabilization of intramolecular and solvent-mediated interactions. Ionic liquids (ILs) have been known to act as cosolvents or surface-active compounds. In the presence of proteins, ILs can have a beneficial effect on their refolding, shelf life, stability, and enzymatic activities. In the work described herein, we used small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) to monitor the aggregation of different concentrations of ILs with protein models, lysozyme (Lys) and bovine serum albumin (BSA), and fluorescence microscopy to assess micelle formation of fluorinated ILs (FILs) with Lys. Furthermore, coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CG-MD) simulations provided a better understanding of Lys-FIL interactions. The results showed that the proteins maintain their globular structures in the presence of FILs, with signs of partial unfolding for Lys and compaction for BSA with increased flexibility at higher FIL concentrations. Lys was encapsulated by FIL, thus reinforcing the potential of ILs to be used in the formulation of protein-based pharmaceuticals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据